frostney/clean-code-review on GitHub
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 1
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Last push
- 23 Sep 2026
Read from GitHub on . Counts change daily.
Use casesSemantic code linting
frostney/clean-code-review
Judges every code file in a pull request against Robert C. Martin's Clean Code with Jev, one calibrated probability per question, then has a writing model turn those findings into two sentences per file and a decision for the change. Runs on Vercel's eve framework as one Next.js project.
More like this
jev-review
Staged code-review workflow with a local dashboard, where Jev judges code changes or a whole codebase.
NiazMorshed2007/jev-review
Local-first MCP plugin giving Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode structured code-quality scores (correctness, complexity, modularity, security) while they work. Sends focused diffs to Jev and keeps keys and code local.
coldteadotai/abide
Open source tool that scores every turn a coding agent takes against project rules that can't be codified into a linter, using Jev, then tells the agent what to fix.
Ohans Emmanuel (@OhansEmmanuel)Opencoldteadotai/abide on github.com211 starsRule breaks 1 in 13 turnsPer check ~300 ms
devagrawal09/stanley-code
Command-line toolkit a coding agent can delegate judgment work to: ranking relevant files, checking a diff against its task and project rules, and triaging test failures or review comments. Each request runs one bounded typed workflow and returns a structured report.
supercorp-ai/supercov
Scores source-file quality by asking Jev a set of yes/no questions, runs the test command you already use, and turns uncovered paths into small queries a coding agent can work through. Scoring costs about a cent per megabyte of source; coverage needs no account, config file or hosted service.
supercorp-aiOpensupercorp-ai/supercov on github.com109 starsScoring cost ~1c/MB
DanRWilloughby/snifftest
A prose linter that flags signs of AI-generated writing, combining zero-dependency countable rules with one judgment model call.
