More like this
- Project
jev-review
Staged code-review workflow with a local dashboard, where Jev judges code changes or a whole codebase.
- Tool
NiazMorshed2007/jev-review
Local-first MCP plugin giving Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode structured code-quality scores (correctness, complexity, modularity, security) while they work. Sends focused diffs to Jev and keeps keys and code local.
- Tool
supercorp-ai/supercov
Scores source-file quality by asking Jev a set of yes/no questions, runs the test command you already use, and turns uncovered paths into small queries a coding agent can work through. Scoring costs about a cent per megabyte of source; coverage needs no account, config file or hosted service.
- Tool
devagrawal09/jev-code
Command-line toolkit a coding agent can delegate judgment work to: ranking relevant files, checking a diff against its task and project rules, and triaging test failures or review comments. Each request runs one bounded typed workflow and returns a structured report.
- Project
frostney/clean-code-review
Judges every code file in a pull request against Robert C. Martin's Clean Code with Jev, one calibrated probability per question, then has a writing model turn those findings into two sentences per file and a decision for the change. Runs on Vercel's eve framework as one Next.js project.
- Project
raihankhan-rk/diffjury
Paste a public GitHub pull request URL and one Jev call returns risk bars and a verdict. The single request covers merge risk, review depth, whether design or security review is needed, missing tests, docs debt and how wide a bug could spread.