Skip to content
System One

Jev vs. GLM at chess (X)

A video demo pits Jev against GLM 5.3 at chess: GLM won by checkmate in 29 moves, with Jev responding in about 0.3 seconds per move versus GLM's 5.8 seconds, for a total game cost of 24 cents.

Still from Jev vs. GLM at chess (X)Play the video in the post below
Still from x.com

Post on X

Views
38,823
Likes
325
Reposts
13

Read from X on . Counts change daily.

Reported by the author

Jev per move
~0.3sJev: ~0.3s and <$0.0001 per movex.com
Game cost
24 centsThe whole game cost 24 centsx.com

Hassan pitted Jev against GLM 5.3 in a full game of chess, with each model choosing moves for one side. GLM 5.3 won by checkmate in 29 moves. On speed and cost, Jev returned a move in about 0.3 seconds for under $0.0001, while GLM 5.3 took roughly 5.8 seconds and about $0.008 per move. The full game cost 24 cents.

Hassan’s takeaway is to route by task: fast, well-defined classification to a specialized model like Jev, and classifications that need reasoning or lookahead to an LLM like GLM 5.3. In a real pipeline, he suggests a hybrid where Jev handles the easy calls and an open model handles the hard ones.

Open on X

More like this

Use cases this is tagged with