Skip to content
System One

kimmonismus on Jev: sounds almost too good to be true (X)

Widely-shared skeptical-but-interested summary, around 145k views, of Jev's claims: 20-200x faster, 40-400x cheaper, $0.042 per 1M input tokens with free output, trained with a new method called RLCD.

Image from kimmonismus on Jev: sounds almost too good to be true (X)
Image from x.com

Post on X

Views
163,291
Likes
1,941
Reposts
98

Read from X on . Counts change daily.

Reported by the author

Speed
20-200x fasterClaimed to be 20–200× faster and 40–400× cheaper than comparable LLMs.x.com
Input cost
$0.042/1M tokCosts $0.042 per million input tokens, with free outputs.x.com

kimmonismus’s post is a skeptical-but-curious summary of what Jev is, rather than a project built on top of it, and it circulated widely. The framing: Jev, introduced by Diogo Almeida, is a model built to make decisions instead of generating text, trained with a method the post calls RLCD.

The claims kimmonismus lists are TypeSafe’s own: 20 to 200 times faster and 40 to 400 times cheaper than comparable large language models, at $0.042 per million input tokens with free output tokens. The trade-off stated is that Jev cannot generate text at all, only pick from options or score them. The post points to two demos as evidence of the range of tasks this covers: controlling a game and choosing between Wikipedia links. Its closing line frames the pitch plainly: fast, cheap decisions embedded directly into software rather than a chat interface.

Open on X

PrimitivesChoiceScoreNoul

More like this

Keep browsing